Phosphorus Nutrient Management for Yield and Reduced P Loss at Edge of Field

AGF-509
Agriculture and Natural Resources
Date: 
09/12/2019
Steve Culman, PhD, Assistant Professor and State Specialist in Soil Fertility, School of Environment and Natural Resources, The Ohio State University
Sam Custer, Extension Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources, OSU Extension
Kevin King, PhD, Research Leader and Agricultural Engineer, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Agricultural Research Service
Greg LaBarge, Field Specialist, Agronomic Systems, OSU Extension
Rory Lewendowski, Extension Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources, OSU Extension
Eric Richer, Extension Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources, OSU Extension

Eight steps to maximize returns to phosphorus in row crop production while reducing downstream contributions to streams and lakes.

  1. Evaluate field erosion from concentrated water flows leaving a field. Use grassed areas, conservation tillage, and cover crops or other appropriate best management practices (BMPs).
    Field with erosion example, showing water flow through field. Drainage tile sticking up from field.
  2. Replace surface tile connections with designed structures (i.e., blind inlets) to reduce soil and nutrient losses.
  3. No application of P containing fertilizer or organic (i.e., manure, biosolids, compost) nutrient sources to frozen or snow-covered soil unless applied to a growing cover crop.
    Field in winter, with some snow cover and tractor tracks Photo of a man with a core sampler in a field
  4. Take a representative soil sample, testing for a minimum of pH, buffer pH, phosphorus-Mehlich III, and potassium for all fields where crops are harvested.
  5. Use soil test results to monitor soil pH (for corn, soybeans, and wheat, desired pH is 6.5–6.8) and follow next step for soil test phosphorus (STP) value in Mehlich Ill.

If STP is 40 PPM or less, go to step 6. If STP is above 40 PPM, go to step 7.

  1. STP value of 40 PPM Mehlich III or less:
    1. CROP YIELD—Reduce risk of crop yield losses with nutrient application.
    • A STP of 20 PPM defines the critical level. At 20 PPM or less, the risk of yield loss increases. Annual in season P nutrient application recommended. Recommendations to build STP to critical level are available.
    • The maintenance STP range is 20–40 PPM. Recommended rate of P is equal to P removed in harvested crop. Annual application is not required. Risk of yield loss is low with flexibility to delay application one (or more) growing seasons, if needed.
    1. WATER QUALITY—The greatest risk for event P losses occur when nutrient application is followed by runoff-producing rainfall. Use the following steps to reduce P loss risk at application:
    • Use an agronomic rate of no more than two years’ worth crop removal as recommended in the Tri-State Fertilizer Recommendations.
    • Time fertilizer applications so predicted rainfall 12 hours after application is less than a 50 percent chance of more than 1 inch of rainfall.
    • Time organic nutrient applications so predicted rainfall 24 hours after application is less than a 50 percent chance of more than 0.5 inches of rainfall.
    • Subsurface placement reduces losses over surface application. 
  2. STP value above 40 PPM Mehlich III:
    1. CROP YIELD—Response to fertilizer with STP greater than 40 PPM is highly unlikely.
    • Do not apply additional fertilizer due to lack of economic return.
    • Organic applications should be determined using P content from testing the organic source and not exceed P crop removal rate for the next two (and no more than three) crops in the rotation.
    • Consider in-crop application to a nitrogen-using crop to reduce purchased N, maximizing economic return to organic application.
    • Where in-crop application is not used, incorporate organic nutrients.
    1. WATER QUALITY—The risk of P loss increases with STP values over 40 PPM, with greater risk after 150 PPM. • Do not apply additional fertilizer: due to lack of economic return. • Do not make organic applications when STP is greater than 150 PPM. Follow NRCS 590 site and rate criteria between 40 to 150 PPM. • Time organic applications so predicted rainfall 24 hours after application is less than a 50 percent chance of more than 0.5 inches of rainfall. • Use the Ohio P risk index, field scale hydrology/water quality models, or monitoring to evaluate site risk for P losses and need for further site BMPs. See step 8.
      Image of a swale between plowed fields, showing areas of possible runoff. Photo of a farmer tilling between rows in a corn field and spraying.
  3. BMPs for high risk P loss sites: Monitor fields for P loss using the Ohio P risk index and field scale hydrologic and water quality models. For sites with predicted high P losses, consider one or more of the following water management practices based on fitness and cost effectiveness for field site:
    • Production practices that increase soil organic matter to retain water on site
    • Drainage Water Management (NRCS 554)
    • Nutrient removal wetlands (NRCS 656)
    • P Precipitating Filter
    • Saturated Buffer (NRCS 604)
    • In-field water storage or detention basins

For more detailed descriptions and supporting data for these recommendations, visit agbmps.osu.edu. Find answers to agronomic fertilizer questions at agcrops.osu.edu.

For a handy, printed version of this fact sheet, please visit agcrops.osu.edu/sites/agcrops/files/publication-files/AGF%20509%20Phosphorus%20Nutrient%20Stewardship%20bifold.pdf

Photos by Greg LaBarge, OSU Extension, unless otherwise noted.
https://agcrops.osu.edu/sites/agcrops/files/publication-files/AGF%20509%20Phosphorus%20Nutrient%20Stewardship%20bifold.pdf