Ohio State University Extension Bulletin

Agronomic Crops Team On-Farm Research Projects 2002

Special Circular 190


Soybean Response to Nitrogen

Glen Arnold, Agriculture and Natural Resources Extension Agent
Ed Lentz, District Extension Agronomy Specialist

Objective

To evaluate the effect nitrogen may have on soybean yields

Background


Cooperator:Glenn KarhoffSoil test:pH 6.5, P 70 ppm, K 180
County:Putnamppm
Nearest Town:GlandorfFertilizer:None
Drainage:Tiled with 45 ft spacingPlanting Date:May 11, 2002
Soil type:Clay loamSeeding Rate:180,000 seeds/acre
Tillage:No tillRow Width:15-inch
Previous Crop:CornHerbicides:Roundup Ultra 1 qt/A +
Variety:Dekalb 31-51AMS
Harvest Date:October 8, 2002

Methods

Experimental design was a randomized complete block with three treatments replicated five times. Treatments included a zero N check and a 50-lb/A N treatment from urea-ammonium nitrate solution (28%) coultered-injected between rows (30-inch spacing) on June 20 and August 10. The plots were planted with a Kinze 2000 planter. Individual plot size was approximately 1/4 acre.

The soybeans were planted in 30-foot wide strips for a length of about 360 feet. Using a John Deere 6620, a 20-foot wide strip was harvested the length of the plot and weighed using a weigh wagon. Grain yield was adjusted to 14% moisture.

Harvest population was approximately 120,000 plants per acre.

Results

Table 1. Soybean Yield and Harvest Moisture.a

N applicationGrainYieldHarvest Moisture
(month)(bu/A)(%)

June48.0 a11.0
none46.0 b11.0
August45.4 b11.0

LSD (0.05)1.6NS
F-test7.8<1
a Means followed by the same letter in same column are not significantly different.

Summary

The test plot had a uniform stand. The growing season was droughty. There was some damage to the soybean stands caused by the nitrogen application equipment. The operator believes the damage can be minimized next year.

The two-bushel-per-acre yield gain from June-applied nitrogen was statistically different from the check. However, given the cost of the nitrogen applied and the operator’s time and equipment, the yield gain did not appear to increase profits. The August-applied nitrogen yield was not significantly different than the check. The operator plans to replicate the study next year to determine if statistically different yields occur in a normal (adequate rainfall) growing season.

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank Glenn Karhoff and Karhoff Farm Seeds for cooperating in this study.

For additional information, contact:
Glen Arnold
Ohio State University Extension, Putnam County
219 South Oak Street
Ottawa, Ohio 45875
419-523-6294
arnold.2@osu.edu


Back | Forward | Table of Contents