Ohio State University Extension Bulletin

Research and Reviews: Dairy 2001

Special Circular 182-01


Environmental Conditions within Tunnel-Ventilated and Naturally Ventilated Dairy Freestall Facilities

Materials and Methods

Six freestall barns, three naturally ventilated (NV) and three tunnel-ventilated (TV), were selected for evaluation in this study (Table 1). One barn of each type was selected in central New York (NY), central Ohio (OHC), and western Ohio (OHW), with the two barns in each region being reasonably close to each other (no more than 20 miles apart). The selected operations demonstrated generally accepted management practices and had primarily Holstein herds with above-average production.

Table 1. General information about the study barns
and their ventilation systems.1

Farm ID Primary system Building dimensions Barn Orientation Stalls Fans
L (ft) W(ft) H*(ft) # Rows # Dia. (in) Loc.**
NV-NY Natural 390 86 12 N-S 360 4 50 36 F & St
TV-NY Tunnel 874 96 9 N-S 1,080 6 20 60 S. end
NV-OHC Natural 256 100 9-12 E-W 200 4 6 48 F & St
TV-OHC Tunnel 160 110 10 N-S 186 6 22 48 N. end
NV-OHW Natural 256 112 12 N-S 312 6 16 51 Stalls
TV-OHW Tunnel 160 114 10 N-S 200 6 21 51 S. end
1NV = naturally ventilated, TV = tunnel ventilated, NY = New York, OHC = Central Ohio, OHIO = western Ohio, L = length, W = width, H = heighth, N = North, S = South, E = East, W = West, F = feeding lanes, and St = f reestalls.
* Eave height
** F & St indicates that fans were situated over feeding lanes and an inner row of freestalls


Back | Forward | Table of Contents