Ohio State University Extension Bulletin

Agronomic Crops Team On-Farm Research Projects 2000

Special Circular 179-01


Food-Grade Soybean Evaluation Trial

Andy Kleinschmidt, Extension Agriculture and Natural Resources Agent
Gary Prill, Farm Focus/Research Coordinator

Objective

To compare several food-grade (FG) soybean varieties vs. two popular conventional (C) soybean varieties.

Background


Cooperator: Marsh Foundation/
Farm Focus
County: Van Wert
Nearest Town: Van Wert
Soil Type: Hoytville silty clay loam
Drainage: Tile
Previous Crop: Corn
Tillage: Fall deep-tilled, spring field
cultivate (2x)
 
Fertilizer: 125 lbs./A 0-0-60 fall applied
Soil Test: pH 6.3, P 86 ppm,
K 235 ppm
Herbicides: PRE ­ Steel (3 pt./A) +
Canopy (2 oz./A)
Row Spacing: 15 inch
Planting Rate: 176,000 seeds/A
Planting Date: May 31, 2000
Harvest Date: October 12, 2000


Methods

This study was conducted using three replications of each soybean variety in a complete randomized block design. Plot size was 27.5-feet wide by 420-feet long, allowing for one round of the combine at harvest. Variety selection was based on local usage. Plots were planted using a John Deere MaxEmerge planter with a splitter attachment to obtain a 15-inch row spacing. The plots were evaluated for final stand populations on the harvest date, yield (weigh-wagon weights), and laboratory analysis for crude protein and oil content. Population counts were taken at three locations in each plot using a 17.5 feet distance and counting the plants in the rows on both sides of the tape. All yield, protein, and fat contents were adjusted to a 13% moisture standard.

Results

Mean harvest populations, yields, and laboratory analysis results for each variety are given in the table on the following page.

Summary

This study indicated significant differences in the final stand populations for the different varieties. This is most likely caused by the wide variations in seed size, since the same seed ing rate setting was used for all varieties. Proper seeding rate settings are important when planting typically larger food-grade seed.


Variety Population
(plants/A)
Yield
(bu/A)
Protein
% @13%moist
Fat
% @13%moist
Seed Size
seeds/lb

Pioneer 93B01 (C) 178,600 a 61.0 ab 35.79 c 19.05 a 3,488 e
Public Sandusky (C) 117,600 b 62.9 a 34.20 d 19.52 a 2,824 d
LG Seed C9275HP (FG) 109,100 bc 51.4 e 40.20 a 16.67 d 2,456 b
Agracola Farms AF271 (FG) 104,900 c 59.8 abc 40.18 a 16.61 d 2,584 c
Wellman Seed-Kohaku (FG) 102,400 c 55.9 cd 37.54 b 18.15 b 2,752 d
Ohio FG-1 (FG) 77,300 d 57.4 bcd 37.67 b 17.16 c 2,072 a
LSD (P=0.05) 9,400 4.3 0.31 0.47 98
CV (<15% is credible) 4.5% 4.1% 0.5% 1.5% 2.0%

Means with the same letter are not significantly different at P = 0.05.


With the large variations experienced in the final stand populations, it is difficult to draw definite conclusions as to the differences in yield, and whether these yield differences were the result of the seeding-rate variation or the variety of soybean. This study would need to be repeated again, paying particular attention to having the same seeding rate for each individual variety for yield comparisons. Another important consideration is to account for germination rates. Despite not accounting for these factors, there appears to be little yield lag with food-grade soybeans.

Protein and fat content results for the varieties are listed because buyers of food-grade soybeans use the protein content as an indicator of the quality of product they can expect from that particular variety. High protein content is a major consideration in developing food-grade varieties. As the table indicates, all the food-grade varieties had significantly higher protein than the conventional varieties. Typically, fat content is inverse to the protein content, as can be seen in the results. Seed size is another characteristic that is often considered by the buyer, with the larger seed size usually being more desirable. There were statistically significant differences in the seed sizes. This is based on the number of seeds per pound after being screened (using a 12/64 inch x 3/4 inch slotted screen) to remove splits and foreign material.

Acknowledgment

The authors wish to express their appreciation to Agracola Farms, LG Seed, Pioneer Hybrids, and Wellman Seed for donating the seed used in this study.

For additional information, contact:

Andy Kleinschmidt Gary Prill
Agriculture and Natural Resources Agent Farm Focus/Research Coordinator
OSU Extension, Van Wert County OSU Extension, Van Wert County
1055 South Washington Street 1055 South Washington Street
Van Wert, OH 45891 Van Wert, OH 45891
419-238-1214 419-238-1214
kleinschmidt.5@osu.edu prill.1@osu.edu


Back | Forward | Table of Contents