Ohio State University Extension Bulletin

Agronomic Crops Team On–Farm Research Projects 2000

Special Circular 179–01


Corn Rootworm Insecticide Comparison

Alan Sundermeier, Extension Agriculture and Natural Resources Agent
Bruce Eisley, Integrated Pest Management Research Associate

Objective

To evaluate corn response to soil rootworm insecticides in a field following soybeans.

Background


Cooperator: Roland and Rob Rettig
Nearest Town: Napoleon
County: Henry
Soil type: Millgrove loam
Tillage: No-till
Soil test: pH 6.2, P 82 ppm, K 346 ppm,
CEC 10.8
Previous crop: Soybean
Fertilizer: 180 lbs 19-17-0/A,
200 lbs/A K2O,
150 lbs/A N
Herbicides: Bicep
Variety: Golden Harvest N58D1
Planting date: April 27, 2000
Planting Population: 30,000/A
Row Width: 30 inch
Harvest Population: See text
Harvest date: November 1, 2000

Methods

A randomized, complete design used four replications of three treatments. The design was duplicated at two fields about one mile apart with the same cropping history. The treatments included a check with no insecticide, corn seed encapsulated with Force insecticide, and liquid Regent insecticide applied in furrow at planting. Individual plots were 15 feet wide and 300 feet long.

On July 20, 2000, corn roots were evaluated for rootworm damage. For each treatment, five root masses were dug, washed, and inspected for rootworm damage. The Iowa scale of 1 = no damage to 3 = economic impact to 5 = severe root pruning was used.

Corn stalk population counts were taken near harvest time. Results reported are the combination of both fields and represent eight replications of each treatment.

Results


Treatments Root Damage
Index
Harvest Population
(plants/A)
Yield
(bu/A)

No insecticide 1.73 b 28,000 b 168.5 a
Force 1.40 a 26,500 a 169.9 ab
Regent 1.42 ab 28,750 b 174.2 b

LSD (0.05) 0.28 998 4.8

Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different.

Summary

These fields were selected because of a history of rootworm damage on past corn crops. Economic thresholds for root damage were not reached in the control treatment. This may have been due to above-average rainfall during the growing season that possibly reduced rootworm larvae numbers.

The Regent insecticide treatment had significantly better corn yield compared to no insecticide. However, the application of Regent would not have increased net return based upon the yields compared to no insecticide.

For additional information, contact:

Alan Sundermeier
Ohio State University Extension, Henry County
104 E. Washington St., Suite 107
Napoleon, OH 43545
419-592-0806
sundermeier.5@osu.edu


Back | Forward | Table of Contents