Ohio State University Extension Bulletin

Agronomic Crops Team On-Farm Research Projects 1999

Special Circular 176-00


Strip Tillage and Fertilizer Timing Effects on Corn in Loam Soil

Alan Sundermeier*, Extension Agriculture and Natural Resources Agent
Dr. Ed Lentz, Extension NW District Agronomist

Objective: To evaluate corn response in two strip-tillage systems and one no-till system on a loam soil.

Background


Cooperator:
County:
Soil type:
Tillage:
Previous Crop:
Fertilizer:
Seeding rate:
Planting date:
Harvest date:
Soil test:
Ron & Todd Hesterman
Henry
loam CEC 9.2
strip or no-till
soybeans
variable
31,000/acre
April 25, 1999
October 3, 1999
OM = 3.1 %, P = 23 ppm, K =103 ppm

Methods

The experimental design was a complete randomized block of field-length, 12-row-wide strips with three replications. Fall strip tillage was done on November 30, 1998.

Tillage Fall fertilizer
actual N-P-K
Fertilizer
placement
Planting fert.
actual
Sidedress N
actual
Total lb/ac
N-P-K
 
Fall strip 179-50-64 5" deep in strip none none 179-50-64
Fall strip none 2 x 2 114-19-3 114 228-19-3
No-till none 2 x 2 114-19-3 114 228-19-3

On April 7, 1999, the no-till areas had 90% residue coverage compared to 40% residue in the strip-tilled zone. At corn stage V2 (7-in. height), 12-inch-deep soil nitrate samples were taken. At corn stage V5 (14-in. height), top leaf tissue samples were taken. At corn silking stage, ear leaf tissue samples were taken. At corn maturity (black layer), corn stalk nitrate samples were taken. Also at this time, ear and stalk population counts were made.

Continuous recording soil thermometers were placed in the no-till area and in the fall strip-till zone. Soil temperature was recorded at the 2 in. seed zone and mean (average of high and low) temperature calculated.
  April 14 -29
mean temperature
May 5 - 25
mean temperature
No-till 49.8 degrees 61.6 degrees
Strip till 50.3 degrees 63.3 degrees

Results

The following data are the average of three replications.

Tillage/ Soil [V5 tissue] [Ear leaf tissue] Stalk
fertilizer nitrate N P K N P K nitrate
timing ppm % % % % % % ppm

no-till
spring
15.0 B 5.14 .30 B 3.61 3.28 .20 B 1.74 B 3503
strip till
spring fert.
16.5 B 5.07 .27 C 4.09 3.19 .18 C 1.79 AB 3240
strip till
fall fert.
8.7 A 5.06 .33 A 4.05 3.21 .23 A 1.90 A 2563

LSD (p=0.05) 4.0 NS .01 NS NS .017 .14 NS

Tillage/      
fertilizer Ear Stalk Yield
timing pop/acre pop/acre bu/acre

no-till/
spring
32,033 32,700 163.0 A
strip till/
spring fert.
30,100 31,000 161.5 A
strip till/
fall fert.
30,000 30,633 182.7 B

LSD (p=0.05) NS NS 10.4
Treatment means followed by the same letter are not significantly different from each other. NS = not significant.

Summary and Notes

The spring-applied total nitrogen was higher (228 lb/ac) vs. fall-applied actual nitrogen (177 lb/ac) which may account for soil and stalk nitrate differences. Fall applied P and K resulted in higher tissue test results. Yield was significantly higher with fall strip tillage combined with fall fertilizer. The effect appears to be from better availability of P and K since stalk nitrate levels were not significantly different and adequate in all treatments.

Weather may have minimized nitrogen losses. Soil was dry from fall throughout the following growing season. This may have kept fall-applied N from leaching. Also soils were warm, which may have allowed more natural release of organic nitrogen.

*For additional information, contact:
Ohio State University Extension, Henry County
104 E. Washington St., Suite 107
Napoleon, OH 43545
419-592-0806 or sundermeier.5@osu.edu


Back | Forward | Table of Contents