Ohio State University Extension Bulletin

Agronomic Crops Team On-Farm Research Projects 1999

Special Circular 176-00


Wheat Yields in an Intercropping System vs. a Conventional Production System

Steve Prochaska, Extension Agriculture and Natural Resources Agent

Objective: To compare wheat yields in a Modified Relay Intercropping (MRI) system and a conventional production system.

Background


Location: The Ohio State University Unger Farm,
Crawford County
Major Soil Types:
Drainage:
Tillage:
Previous Crop:
Interseeded:
Blount, Pewamo
Systematic
Disked twice
Soybeans
Soybeans 6/9/99
Soil Test: pH 7.3
P - 16 ppm
K - 88 ppm
Fertilizer: Fall 1997: 26-104-120/acre
3/22/99 95 lbs N/acre
Herbicide: 1 pt 2,4-D ester, 4-14-98 at Feeke's 5 to 6 growth stage

Methods

The Ohio Wheat Performance Test and MRI plots were located on different fields but the same farm site in 1999. Fertility and weed control for the conventional and Modified Relay Intercropped wheat were the same.

Row spacing in the conventional system was 7.5 inches and in the MRI system it was 10 inches. There was also a 20-inch tramline in the MRI system plots. Fall planting date was slightly different between the conventional wheat (9/30/99) and MRI system wheat (10/5/98). The winter and spring weather was ideal for wheat production.

Results

Variety MRI Conventional
Hopewell 80 bu/acre 94 bu/acre
X15 80 bu/acre 93 bu/acre
Agra962 88 bu/acre 95 bu/acre
Average 83 bu/acre 94 bu/acre
F = 17.3, significant at P = 0.05, coefficient of variation 3.8, LSD (0.05) = 7.6.

Summary

J. Beuerlein of Ohio State University has reported from previous research that there was no difference in wheat yield between 7.5-inch and 10-inch row wheat in conventional systems. There was a significant difference between 10-inch wheat yield in an MRI system and 7.5-inch wheat in a conventional production system. MRI wheat yields on average were 11 bushels (13.9%) less than conventional wheat yields. Previous work done by Dr. D. Jeffers of Ohio State University indicated about a 10% yield differential between conventional and MRI wheat yields. However, most of the previous work was done in lower yielding wheat.

The seeding of soybeans into wheat in 1998 damaged wheat and reduced yield; however, in 1999 little damage was done to the wheat as a result of the interseeding. Other analyses in 1999 would indicate the tramline being responsible for the greatest amount of variation in yield between the two systems.

For additional information, contact:

Ohio State University Extension, Crawford County
117 East Mansfield Street
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-8731
prochaska.1@osu.edu


Back | Forward | Table of Contents