Manure is a valuable resource that needs to be managed effectively and efficiently. Land application of manure should not be considered simply a disposal system. Manure provides nutrients for crops and helps build and maintain soil fertility. Manure can also improve soil tilth, increase water-holding capacity, lessen wind and water erosion, improve aeration, and promote beneficial organisms. There are three principal objectives in applying animal manure to land:
Available land for manure application is an important consideration for all livestock operations. When planning a new operation or expanding an existing operation, adequate land area for manure application must be included in the plan. A conservative approach in determining the amount of land required is to consider the removal of the nutrient by the harvested crop. This will ensure that enough land area is available in future years to prevent nutrient buildup in the soil beyond recommended agronomic and environmental levels.
The whole farm nutrient management procedures described in Chapter 2, Whole Farm Nutrient Budget/Planning, provide guidelines for balancing nutrient inputs and outputs on the farm. In addition to balancing nutrients, best management practices (BMPs) for applying manure to crops must be used. To maximize manure nutrients while minimizing potential environmental impacts and neighbor’s concerns, manure application must consider nutrient losses during handling and storage, runoff and preferential flow, and timing and rate of application.
Nitrogen (N) is the nutrient most likely to be lost during handling and storage of manure. Table 13 provides a comparison of N losses due to storage and handling. The systems are described in Chapter 3, Manure-Management Systems. Nitrogen lost to the atmosphere through volatilization can be reduced by applying manure when soil and air temperatures are less than 50ºF and by incorporating manure into the soil within 24 hours of application. The amount of N available from the manure also depends on the method of application. Injecting, chiseling, or knifing liquid manure into the soil minimizes odors and nutrient losses to the air or as surface runoff.
| Table 13. Estimated Nitrogen Losses During Storage and Handling. | |
| System | Percent Nitrogen Lost |
|---|---|
| Solid Systems | |
| Daily Scrape and Haul | 25–35% |
| Manure Pack | 20–40% |
| Open Lot | 40–55% |
| Deep Pit (poultry) | 25–50% |
| Litter | 25–50% |
| Liquid Systems | |
| Pit under Floor* | 15–30% |
| Above-Ground Tank* | 10–30% |
| Holding Pond | 20–40% |
| Lagoon | 70–85% |
| *Indicates losses due to agitation | |
| Source: MWPS-18, Section 2, Table 1-1. MidWest Plan Service. Used by permission. | |
Table 14 gives approximate manure nutrient values for land-applied manure, taking into account handling and storage losses.
| Table 14. Approximate Manure Nutrient Values at the Time of Application. | ||||||
| Animal Type and Storage Type | Estimated Nutrient Content1 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lbs/Ton | Lbs/1000 Gallons | |||||
| N | P2O5 | K2O | N | P2O5 | K2O | |
| Dairy Heifer | ||||||
| Manure Pack | 4.2 | 1.7 | 5.6 | |||
| Open Lot | 3.0 | 1.7 | 5.6 | |||
| Holding Pond | 12.1 | 5.0 | 16.1 | |||
| Pit | 22.7 | 8.2 | 26.6 | |||
| Dairy Lactating Cow | ||||||
| Manure Pack | 6.9 | 5.1 | 5.2 | |||
| Open Lot | 4.9 | 5.1 | 5.2 | |||
| Holding Pond | 18.9 | 13.9 | 14.4 | |||
| Pit | 28.6 | 18.5 | 19.1 | |||
| Dairy Dry Cow | ||||||
| Manure Pack | 5.4 | 2.4 | 6.0 | |||
| Open Lot | 3.9 | 2.4 | 6.0 | |||
| Holding Pond | 14.7 | 6.4 | 16.4 | |||
| Pit | 22.1 | 8.4 | 21.5 | |||
| Veal | ||||||
| Pit | 6.2 | 5.8 | 11.6 | |||
| Manure Pack | 3.9 | 4.1 | 8.3 | |||
| Beef Cattle | ||||||
| Manure Pack | 7.9 | 4.4 | 6.6 | |||
| Open Lot | 5.6 | 4.4 | 6.6 | |||
| Holding Pond | 20.0 | 11.1 | 17.0 | |||
| Pit | 29.1 | 14.1 | 21.5 | |||
| Swine | ||||||
| Manure Pack | 6.6 | 5.9 | 4.8 | |||
| Open Lot | 4.7 | 5.9 | 4.8 | |||
| Holding Pond | 18.0 | 16.0 | 13.1 | |||
| Pit | 31.8 | 24.8 | 20.3 | |||
| Lagoon2 | 1.4 | 3.6 | 2.9 | |||
| Sheep | ||||||
| Manure Pack | 6.3 | 4.5 | 9.0 | |||
| Poultry3 | ||||||
| Manure Pack | 52 | 72 | 38 | |||
| Horse | ||||||
| Manure Pack | 6.6 | 3.7 | 7.7 | |||
| 1 Values vary with bedding, water content, feed programs, and specific livestock. 2 Values are for the supernatant (unagitated liquid on the top of the lagoon). 3 Poultry—based on typical analysis from poultry barns from Ohio NRCS records. |
||||||
| Source: Manure Characteristics, MWPS-18, Section 1, 2000, and Purdue MMP version 1.9.4. Used by permission. | ||||||
Additional issues need to be considered when applying liquid manure and wastewater. To minimize the risk of runoff or preferential flow (see following section), site inspection and preparation are important. In addition, hourly application rates must be controlled as discussed later in this chapter. Appendix E, Liquid Manure Application, provides management guidelines and information on equipment needs.
The use of manure or wastewater for “true” irrigation is seldom accomplished because of the relatively small volumes applied and annual application-rate restrictions. Those who desire to irrigate in addition to spreading manure must be certain of an adequate supply of water available for irrigating. Liquid manure from below-ground storage, earth basins, or above-ground storage should not be used to irrigate growing crops as the manure is usually high in ammonia and solids, which can coat and/or burn vegetation. However, wastewater in the second stage of a two-stage lagoon may be dilute enough for irrigation on growing crops.
Excess nutrients in soil may impact the environment when they are dissolved or eroded and transported to surface or ground water supplies. Excess phosphorus (P) in surface waters can result in eutrophication and a decrease in oxygen levels in the water that leads to loss of animal life. Nitrogen compounds may harm human health and are toxic to fish. In addition, erosion of manure may contaminate water supplies with pathogens such as E. coli or Cryptosporidium. Minimizing these environmental risks requires using best management practices when applying manure to cropland.
While most transport of P occurs with the erosion of soil sediment, it can also leach if soil P levels are too high. Phosphorus accumulates in soils if applied in quantities greater than those removed by crops. Accumulation of P in the soil can be measured by soil-testing.
To minimize potential N runoff, manure applications should not provide more available N than what is needed by the succeeding crop. For corn, the determination of total available N should include credits for any contributions of the present or preceding crop, any N fertilizer added, and available N provided by previous manure applications. The Tri-State Fertilizer Recommendations (contact Ohio State University Extension or see ohioline.osu.edu/e2567) provide recommendations for corn, soybeans, wheat, and alfalfa for N-P-K fertilizer.
Runoff potential is affected by numerous factors, some of which are fixed by the nature and location of the field, while other factors can be altered through management. Runoff potential must be determined on a site-by-site basis by evaluating:
Management factors that can alter the potential for manure runoff into a stream include:
| Table 15. Minimum Recommended Setback Distances from Sensitive Areas. | |||
| Minimum Setback Distances for the Application of Manure and Other Organic By-Products. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Type of Sensitive-Setback Area | Setbacks Based on Methods of Manure Application | ||
| Surface Application | Winter Application Frozen or Snow-Covered Soils5 | Surface Incorporation Within 24 Hours OR Direct Injection | |
| Residences/Private Wells down slope from the application area. | 100 ft. | 200 ft. | 100 ft. |
| —Sinkholes | 300 ft. | 100 ft. | |
| —Pond or Lake | 35-ft. Vegetative Barrier1, with the remaining 100-ft. setback in non-vegetative setback2 | 35-ft. Vegetative Barrier1, with the remaining 200-ft. setback in non-vegetative setback2 | 35-ft. Vegetative Barrier1 |
| —Streams —Ditches —Surface Inlets |
35-ft. Vegetative Barrier1, OR 100-ft. setback in non-vegetative setback, OR 35 ft. in non-vegetative setback3 | 200 ft. | None |
| Grassed Waterway | 35 ft. | 200 ft. | None |
| Field Surface Drains | 35 ft.4 | 200 ft. | None |
| Public Wells | 300 ft. | 300 ft. | 100 ft. |
| Developed Springs | 300 ft. upslope | 300 ft. upslope | 300 ft. upslope |
| Public Surface Drinking-Water Intake | 300 ft. | 300 ft. | 300 ft. |
| Source: Ohio Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Field Office Technical Guide, Section IV, Standard 633. Used by permission. | |||
| Footnotes: 1 Permanent vegetation consisting of grass, grass/legume mix, trees/shrubs, or trees/shrubs and grass/legumes. Measured from top of bank. 2 Includes 100-ft. total setback. The setback must include a minimum of 35 ft. of vegetative cover from top of bank with the remainder of the 100 feet with no vegetative requirement. The setback is measured from the top of bank. 3 Applies if the manure application area has at least 50% vegetation/residue cover at the time of application. 4 No setback required for field surface drains if the manure is incorporated. 5 A more detailed estimate can be obtained by using the Purdue Manure Management computer program available through the Natural Resources Conservation Service. |
|||
| Comments: a. CAFO’s must follow the setbacks defined in the Ohio Department of Agriculture (ODA) rules regarding manure application (Rule 901:10-1-14: Land Application Restrictions and Setbacks). b. Excludes sludge that is regulated by the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (OEPA) and septage regulated by the Ohio Department of Health. c. See “Application of wastes to frozen and snow-covered soil” in this chapter for additional criteria to minimize runoff from frozen and snow-covered soils. |
|||
From USDA–Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), Ohio Field Office Technical Guide, Section IV, Standard 633. Used by permission.
Liquid manure applied to fields that are tile drained presents a risk of the liquid manure following preferential flow paths, such as worm holes, cracks, old root channels, directly to subsurface (tile) drains. Some of these channels connect directly to subsurface drains and are a direct route to surface water. Anything that promotes good drainage will increase the risk of preferential flow of liquid manure to subsurface drains. The greatest area of concern is two to three feet horizontally from the tile line.
Most problems occur with liquid manure having a low solids content. As the percentage of solids in the manure decreases (high water content), viscosity (stickiness) decreases, and the manure flows more easily to tile lines. Typically, liquid swine manure from a lagoon is 95% water, 5% solids, and liquid dairy manure is 97 to 98% water and only 2 to 3% solids. Milkhouse wastes and egg wash are highly diluted and have even less solids. However, gray water from all these systems may have very high BOD (biological oxygen demand), ammonia, and soluble phosphorus levels that can be deadly to fish and aquatic organisms if it reaches surface water without treatment.
Injection of the liquid manure can actually make the situation worse, especially if sweep-type shovels are used on the injection equipment. Ideally, the liquid manure should be applied at low rates, under low pressure, evenly across the soil, and either at or slightly below the soil surface to allow the liquid manure to infiltrate the soil, be absorbed by the soil, and be treated. Strategies to minimize the movement of liquid manure to subsurface drains include:
Record keeping is important in preventing manure in subsurface (tile) lines. Document application rates, set-back distances, weather and soil conditions, subsurface drain lines and outlets, broken tile, sink holes, and other potential problems to help prevent environmental problems in the future. Have emergency equipment (backhoe, bales of straw, pumps, etc.) available if a liquid manure spill occurs. See Chapter 7, Safety and Manure Handling.
Source: USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), Ohio Field Office Technical Guide, Section IV, Standard 633. Used by permission.
Using best management practices to determine the rate and timing of manure application will optimize crop production, reduce environmental risks, and minimize neighbors’ concerns. The factors that most often limit the amount of manure that should be applied to cropland are existing soil-fertility levels, manure nutrient content and concentration, crop nutrient needs, runoff potential, slope, leaching potential, and site limitations. Hauling distances, distance to surface water, distance to neighbors, distance to water wells, the potential for manure leaching to tile lines, and other factors can also limit how and when manure is applied.
Manure application rates must balance manure nutrients with crop nutrient requirements as discussed in Chapter 2, Whole Farm Nutrient Budget/Planning. In general, only about one-third of the organic nitrogen in animal manure is available to crops during the year it is applied, and the remaining two-thirds, residual organic nitrogen, becomes part of the soil organic matter over time (Table 16). Phosphorus and potassium from manure application are considered as available as commercial fertilizer during the first growing season. The limiting nutrient, usually nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), or potassium (K), will determine the amount of manure applied. The limits on the amount of phosphorus that can be applied are those that most often limit any further manure applications. Since it is difficult to balance manure nutrients, additional fertilizer applications may be needed to balance the crop’s nutrient needs.
| Table 16. Estimated N Availability of Manure Based on Time and Application Method. | |||
| Available Nitrogen Percent | Time of Application | Days Until Incorporated | |
|---|---|---|---|
| NH4 | Organic N | Date | Days |
| 50% | 33% | Nov-Feb | < 5 |
| 25% | 33% | Nov-Feb | > 5 |
| 50% | 33% | Mar-April | < 3 |
| 25% | 33% | Mar-April | > 3 |
| 75% | 33% | April-June | < 1 |
| 25% | 33% | April-June | > 1 |
| 75%* | 15% | July-Aug | < 1 |
| 25% | 15% | July-Aug | > 1 |
| 25% | 33% | Sept-Oct | < 1 |
| 15% | 33% | Sept-Oct | > 1 |
| Notes: a. The calculations are for all animal manures. It is assumed that 50% of the organic N in poultry manure is converted to NH4 rapidly and is therefore included in the NH4 column for calculating available N. b. Incorporation is the mixing of manure and soil in the tillage layer. Disking is usually enough tillage for conserving nitrogen availability. *c. The 75% available nitrogen (NH4) is based on the nitrogen being used in the year it is applied. If the nitrogen is carried over to the following year, then 25% available nitrogen should be used. |
|||
| Source: Ohio State University Extension Bulletin 604, 1992 Edition. | |||
Evaluation of nutrients is needed to determine accurate manure application rates. Plant tissue analysis should be done on a regular basis to monitor the nutrient balance of the crop. Soils receiving manure should be tested for plant-available nutrients before manure application. Also, the manure should be tested. Application rates of manure are determined by using the results of these tests.
Soil should be tested at least every five years. If the grower has applied P and K over the years, soil-test levels may be in the adequate to high range. It is important to note that manure contains more K than magnesium (Mg) and after many years of continued manure application, the ratio of K to Mg may be too high for optimum crop growth. To adjust the ratio, additional Mg may have to be added as dolomitic limestone, if the soil pH indicates an acid soil. Adding high levels of manure may also increase soluble salts in the soil and reduce plant stands.
Accurate application rates for manure should consider soil moisture to reduce the risk of runoff (Appendix F, Available Water Capacity), and equipment should be calibrated to obtain the desired application rate (Appendix H, Nutrient Application Equipment Calibration and Appendix I, Manure Spreader Volume Conversions). In addition, understanding the effects of manure application practices on nutrient levels in the soil and methods to minimize nutrient buildup is essential to minimizing environmental impacts.
The manure utilization and cropping systems used on a particular field should maintain Bray-Kurtz P1 soil-test P levels at no greater than 80 pounds per acre or 40 ppm of P in the top eight inches of soil. Special precautions should be taken if manure is applied where Bray-Kurtz P1 levels already exceed this level. If manure must be applied to fields with levels greater than 80 pounds per acre or 40 ppm P, the following recommendations should be considered:
One approach to planning manure application rates is to apply two or three years of P or K in one year. See Table 17 as an example. Often the goal with manure applications is to meet the nitrogen needs of the crop first. However, with this goal, phosphorus and potassium needs are often exceeded.
| Table 17. Multiple-Year Manure Nutrient Applications |
| Applying 2-3 Years P2O5 or K2O Crop Requirements with “one” application of manure. Due to the nutrient composition of most livestock manure, one can usually apply two or three years worth of P2O5 and K2O while not over applying nitrogen for the succeeding crop. Applying manure on a two- to three-year cycle also reduces the risk of soil compaction and reduces the acres needed in any one year. The following example demonstrates how one can apply enough manure in one application to meet the P2O5 and K2O crop needs while not over applying nitrogen for the succeeding crop: |
EXAMPLE:
|
Apply enough manure to meet P2O5 needs for three years:
|
RESULTS:
|
| Source: USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), Ohio Field Office Technical Guide, Section IV, Standard 590. Used by permission. |
Applications of P2O5 above 250 lbs per acre are not recommended. However, if P2O5 concentrations in the liquid manure exceed 60 lbs P2O5 per 1,000 gallons or 80 lbs P2O5 per ton for solid manure or other bio-solids rates higher than 250 lbs per acre may need to be applied due to limitations of the application equipment. P2O5 applications should not exceed 500 lbs per acre of P2O5 during one year from manure or other bio-solids. When P2O5 applications exceed 250 lbs per acre, the following are recommended:
Other limitations to manure application include volume limitations relating to how much manure can physically be applied to the soil at one time. With low nutrient concentrations in liquid manure, large volumes of liquids may be applied and yet the crop nutrient needs may not be met simply because the liquid is mostly water and has low concentrations of nutrients. Application of liquid manure above the available water capacity of the soil can create a runoff risk and leaching to tile or underground water (See Appendix F, Available Water Capacity.) Manure application equipment on wet soils can cause significant soil compaction.
To prevent runoff or preferential flow, hourly application rate should be matched to the infiltration rate and permeability of the soil. The design application rate should be conservative and usually lower than the maximum allowable rate in the Ohio Irrigation Guide, because the soil intake rate may be reduced over time by the solids and salt content in some wastes. When recommended application rates vary with soil depth, use the value at eight inches of depth, which is less than that at the surface.
Limit the one-time application volume to an amount that will bring the soil to field moisture capacity. (See Appendix F, Available Water Capacity.) Limit application rates to the water-holding capacity of the top eight inches of the soil profile. The amount applied must not exceed the holding capacity of the soil at the time of application. Inspect fields for broken tiles and other possible short-circuit routes that could result in a direct discharge of manure to drainage tile and surface-drainage ditches. If rapid infiltration to subsurface drainage tile is a problem, consider light disking, shallow chisel plowing, or other tillage operations before irrigating manure and wastewater to improve the soil’s infiltration and holding capacity. Lower application rates and multiple passes with irrigation equipment may also be necessary.
Source: USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), Ohio Field Office Technical Guide, Section IV, Standard 633. Used by permission.
Crop rotation and seasonal variations affect when manure should be applied. In a corn-soybean rotation, the fall, after the crops are harvested, is the best time to apply manure. Generally, the fall has drier weather so compaction problems can be minimized. Fieldwork can also be accomplished in the fall to incorporate the manure. Sometimes manure can be applied in the spring if weather conditions and time permit. Usually, manure cannot be applied during the growing season, although some liquid systems may permit side-dress applications of manure to corn.
If wheat or oats are in the rotation, the manure can be applied in the late summer months. For wheat or oats, winter and spring applications of manure to the growing crop are not recommended. Forage crops (grasses and legumes) are capable of using more nutrients than row crops (corn, soybeans, and wheat).
A planned grazing system can substantially reduce the manure that must be handled and applied and can reduce costs and environmental hazards. Manure can be applied to hay or pasture land but smaller applications are need to preserve forage quality and to limit crop damage. It is preferable to apply manure on pastures and hayland soon after cutting or grazing before re-growth has occurred. Also, limit the application rate to avoid salt damage and/or coverage to the pasture and hayland. Table 18 provides general guidelines for timing manure application.
| Table 18. General Field/Crops Availability for Manure Application. | ||||||||||||
| Crop | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corn | ||||||||||||
| Soybeans | ||||||||||||
| Wheat/Stubble | ||||||||||||
| Oats | ||||||||||||
| Hay | ||||||||||||
| Pasture | ||||||||||||
| Legend: | Winter Application Not Recommended. If applications are necessary, apply with 90% ground cover, < 10 tons or 5,000 gal, and use wider setbacks. | |||||||||||
| Apply with care to minimize compaction. | ||||||||||||
| Growing cropland not available for manure application. | ||||||||||||
| Generally lowest risk of runoff and lowest compaction risk. | ||||||||||||
| Apply with care to avoid crop damage and forage quality. | ||||||||||||
| Source: USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), Ohio Field Office Technical Guide, Section IV, Standard 633. Used by permission. | ||||||||||||
Source: USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), Ohio Field Office Technical Guide, Section IV, Standard 633. Used by permission.
Application on frozen and snow-covered soil is not recommended. However, if manure application becomes necessary on frozen or snow-covered soils, only limited quantities of manure should be applied. Frozen soil means that the soil surface is frozen so that manure cannot be injected into the soil profile. If winter application becomes necessary, applications should be applied only if ALL the following criteria are met:
Source: USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), Ohio Field Office Technical Guide, Section IV, Standard 633. Used by permission.
Manure should not to be applied to cropland with slopes of more than 15% or to pastures/hayland with slopes of more than 20% unless one of the following precautions is taken:
Timing of manure application should also consider the potential impact on neighbors. To develop and maintain good neighbor relations, give adequate notice of the intent to land-apply manure and do not haul and spread on weekends, holidays, or important events. Good communication is key to minimizing neighbor’s complaints.
Keep good field records of soil and manure test results, yields achieved, and nutrients applied (time, form, rate, and method of application). Records should be kept for a period of five years or longer (metals analyses and associated application rates and locations should be maintained permanently):